Is Smoke Pollution? How Low Can Insurance Companies Go?

Brooks Schuelke
Brooks Schuelke
Contributor
Posted by Brooks SchuelkeDecember 18, 2008 11:28 AM

After a 2007 Houston office fire killed three people, the families of the victims have filed suit against the building's owner. The owner thought it was in good hands because it had insurance, but now the insurance company has filed its own lawsuit asking a court to declare that the losses are not covered.

The problem? Like most fire victims, the victims weren't killed by the flames, but died from smoke inhalation. The insurance company is asking the court to declare that the smoke is "pollution." Therefore, the company claims, the section of the insurance policy that excludes payment for pollution --- designed to protect insurance companies from having to pay for costs to cleanup discharges or seepages --- excludes payments for these deaths.

I think this is ridiculous. This exclusion was never intended to be interpreted this far, and the insurance company knows it. And I'm not alone in that thinking. From the article:

Tom Baker, an insurance law expert who teaches at Penn Law school, said property insurance has a long history of being designed for fire coverage and excluding a fire's smoke is applying the law too broadly.

But, he said, smoke can be tricky and Texas may be a state where the literal meaning could be considered rather than common understanding.

"The purpose of a pollution exclusion is not to not cover people who die from smoke inhalation in a fire," Baker said. "I would hope they (the insurers) lose this."

What's the underlying problem? The Texas Supreme Court has spent years issuing rulings that are designed to eliminate common law and statutory bad faith claims against insurance companies. In years' past, the threat of these type of claims, and the accompanying exemplary damages, provided an incentive for insurance companies to do the right things. But after the recent spate of Supreme Court rulings, insurance companies have little to lose by making ridiculous arguments and delaying or not paying on legitimate claims.

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Z Rogers
Posted by Z Rogers
January 09, 2009 4:52 PM

So at what point does America say enough is enough and form common sence legislation that provides not just penalties for this type of corporate leagal thuggery, but also puts a reasonable figure on a death?

Putting penalties in place such as "Great American" gets to pay an additional 50% of the origanal amount due if they lose the delay tactic case would be a deffinate incentive for companies not to do this just because thier lawyers are on retainer. This is the same game that Allstate has been playing for years.

But in addition $25 mil is an outragous amount for the 3 deaths. You can argue whatever you like in this matter. The person who died would have made 8.3 mil in thier life so thats what's due...uhm, no. That same person who died in the fire could have been hit by a stray bullet the very next day, or simply dropped dead from an blood clot. A wife is paid 10 mil for the death of her husband. You think she is going to stretch that money out over his expected 45 yr life span? Not going to happen!

In my uneducated opinion both sides need to be reined in.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Austin

InjuryBoard Austin RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address