Will An Odd Texas Personal Injury Case Make It To The US Supreme Court?

Brooks Schuelke
Brooks Schuelke
Contributor
Posted by Brooks SchuelkeDecember 29, 2008 11:39 AM
Tags: None

I've seen cases based on unusual fact patterns, but this personal injury claim is a first for me. In 2002, a Tarrant County jury awarded a plaintiff $300,000 (later reduced to $188,000) for injuries that she suffered during a forced exorcism. The Texas Supreme Court summarized the facts of ne of two incidents as:

During the evening service, Laura collapsed. After her collapse, several church members took Laura to a classroom where they “laid hands” on her and prayed. According to Laura, church members forcibly held her arms crossed over her chest, despite her demands to be freed. According to those present, Laura clenched her fists, gritted her teeth, foamed at the mouth, made guttural noises, cried, yelled, kicked, sweated, and hallucinated. The parties sharply dispute whether these actions were the cause or the result of her physical restraint.

The plaintiff sued her church and church members claiming that she not only had physical injuries, but also suffered severe mental anguish (including later hallucinations that may have led to suicide attempts).

This summer, the Texas Supreme Court overturned the verdict saying that the case "presents an ecclesiastical dispute over religious conduct that would unconstitutionally entangle the court in matters of church doctrine."

Lawyers for the plaintiff say that they are now appealing the decision to the US Supreme Court. Now normally, I wouldn't think much of that since the US Supreme Court only agrees to hear a fraction of the cases appealed to it. But the Court does like religious freedom cases, and this one might have a shot. I'll try and keep readers posted as the case progresses.

2 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Steve Lombardi
Posted by Steve Lombardi
December 30, 2008 8:43 AM

I don't see how these facts present an exercise of religious authority when there is in fact physical restraint to which, in the end, the injured congregant did not willingly particicpate. To use an analogy; if a congregant experienced a heart attack, and the members did this same exercise of exercism as opposed to calling medical personnel, the negligence of the group would be obvious. In the exercism case when the congregant voices that she no longer wishes to participate, forcing her to do so is a tort no different than if I restrain my neighbor against their will. It is certainly a very interesting case.

Brooks Schuelke
Posted by Brooks Schuelke
January 02, 2009 10:12 AM

I agree Steve. That's why I'm cautiously optimistic that the U.S. Supreme Court might step in.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Austin

InjuryBoard Austin RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address